>>137070>AI使ってたNo, but I did look up the details of the Manhattan Project and the "article 9", and searched my disk for the attached book pages.
>アメリカは味方を守るために何回も遠い他国と戦って勝利したSince the end of WW2, I don't think the US has fought any war to "protect allies". It did fight wars to expand its empire and benefit Israel (which, believe it or not, is actually not a real treaty-bound military ally). Of those, I think the best results were a stalemate in the Korean peninsula (resulting in the addition of South Korea as a colony) and, with NATO, the excision of Kosovo from Serbia (a violation of international law). The "wars on terror" (for Israel) were strategically inert and financially ruinous. During the Cold War it also nurtured coups and proxy conflicts, funding and arming enemies of the USSR (thus becoming buddies with the likes of Osama bin Laden and his Mujahidin). These were more cost-effective.
>味方だった中国と戦争までしたAre you talking about the incident after the "Sino-soviet split"? That was not a war but a series of border skirmishes. Also, they were never real allies.
>同じく自分勝手...間違ってるAgain... One empire has only 2 weak neighbors, 2 vast oceans around a continent-sized landmass, and is still living, the other has/had 12+ neighbors, no geographic natural borders, is located in the permanent battlefield known as Europe, and suffered a collapse. However, the instinct is the same. Open any primer on the realist school of international relations.
>...多くて好かれるのよEverybody likes the strong horse. The USSR failed and disintegrated. The US went to establish hegemony. I do not dispute that the US has been a more successful (and competent) power, that's obvious. But this does not impinge on my argument about the fundamentally self-interested behavior of great powers on the international stage. Just need to take that dick out of your mouth for a minute while observing US behavior and it will be clear.
>ロシアは味方の面倒すら...支配して...停滞...Going in circles now. Re-read my previous replies. Will ignore this from now on.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.